<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeannie Draws Swords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeannielin.com/jeannie-draws-swords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeannielin.com/jeannie-draws-swords/</link>
	<description>Historical Romance Author website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Rose Meadors</title>
		<link>http://www.jeannielin.com/jeannie-draws-swords/comment-page-1/#comment-20194</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Rose Meadors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 19:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeannielin.com/?p=4760#comment-20194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Especially seeing as how so often, the cover art is REALLY far removed from the plot-line of the story, I have to agree with you that it is not a solution.  LOL but for someone only judging books by their covers, maybe it is!  But see, there is something to be said about a woman being feminine, too.  Does a woman need to be... well, if not manly, weapon wielding, to be strong?  I should hope not.  Women have their strengths that men do not have, and I think that should be celebrated.  I LOVE the cover of your new book because I think the woman is beautiful and graceful, and having read your other books, I know the chances are she has the personality to back up her looks :).  I don&#039;t find that your characters are objects because they take action.  But I know that people who do not read romance do tend to just lump it all together and have a label for it.  It&#039;s hard to fight with that mentality when people form a prejudice and don&#039;t even bother to read the stories!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially seeing as how so often, the cover art is REALLY far removed from the plot-line of the story, I have to agree with you that it is not a solution.  LOL but for someone only judging books by their covers, maybe it is!  But see, there is something to be said about a woman being feminine, too.  Does a woman need to be&#8230; well, if not manly, weapon wielding, to be strong?  I should hope not.  Women have their strengths that men do not have, and I think that should be celebrated.  I LOVE the cover of your new book because I think the woman is beautiful and graceful, and having read your other books, I know the chances are she has the personality to back up her looks <img src='http://www.jeannielin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  I don&#8217;t find that your characters are objects because they take action.  But I know that people who do not read romance do tend to just lump it all together and have a label for it.  It&#8217;s hard to fight with that mentality when people form a prejudice and don&#8217;t even bother to read the stories!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannie Lin</title>
		<link>http://www.jeannielin.com/jeannie-draws-swords/comment-page-1/#comment-20190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannie Lin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 18:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeannielin.com/?p=4760#comment-20190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the argument that romance objectifies women -- and men -- is a valid one and the covers are definitely suspect. However, I think the discussion isn&#039;t valid unless it&#039;s being done by people who have actually read a romance or preferably many romances. And there are many readers who do look at romance with such a critical eye, but I value their opinions if they actually have some breadth or depth of knowledge of the books they are criticizing. 

But it does go to illustrate my original question. Some see the inclusion of Asian women into romance as a liberating step. Yet for others, it&#039;s simply another example of objectification. My thoughts are maybe my portrayals are two dimensional and cliched, but 1) then let Asian heroines be fairy tale princesses with their happy endings too 2) let&#039;s bring the argument down to the execution vs. a summary rejection of the genre.

As to the covers --  I actually don&#039;t feel putting women with swords and guns and making them look all Lara Croft like on many UF and paranormal covers is necessarily a solution either. There could be an interesting discussion there, but as it stands, there&#039;s nothing to engage on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the argument that romance objectifies women &#8212; and men &#8212; is a valid one and the covers are definitely suspect. However, I think the discussion isn&#8217;t valid unless it&#8217;s being done by people who have actually read a romance or preferably many romances. And there are many readers who do look at romance with such a critical eye, but I value their opinions if they actually have some breadth or depth of knowledge of the books they are criticizing. </p>
<p>But it does go to illustrate my original question. Some see the inclusion of Asian women into romance as a liberating step. Yet for others, it&#8217;s simply another example of objectification. My thoughts are maybe my portrayals are two dimensional and cliched, but 1) then let Asian heroines be fairy tale princesses with their happy endings too 2) let&#8217;s bring the argument down to the execution vs. a summary rejection of the genre.</p>
<p>As to the covers &#8212;  I actually don&#8217;t feel putting women with swords and guns and making them look all Lara Croft like on many UF and paranormal covers is necessarily a solution either. There could be an interesting discussion there, but as it stands, there&#8217;s nothing to engage on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Rose Meadors</title>
		<link>http://www.jeannielin.com/jeannie-draws-swords/comment-page-1/#comment-20180</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Rose Meadors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeannielin.com/?p=4760#comment-20180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK..Your heroine above is holding A BIG FRACKING SWORD. Need I say more?

As someone who HAS read your books, and who has read romance in the past DECADE, I can attest that your heroines are not objects.  In each story there is a woman who takes action for her self preservation, and there happens to be a man there--whom she discovers completes her in some way.  Not only do your women know how to take care of themselves, but often they will take steps to save your hero as well!

But most importantly, you are right--the fact that the person giving the critique has not read any of your books renders his or her arguments insignificant.  Like water on a duck&#039;s back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK..Your heroine above is holding A BIG FRACKING SWORD. Need I say more?</p>
<p>As someone who HAS read your books, and who has read romance in the past DECADE, I can attest that your heroines are not objects.  In each story there is a woman who takes action for her self preservation, and there happens to be a man there&#8211;whom she discovers completes her in some way.  Not only do your women know how to take care of themselves, but often they will take steps to save your hero as well!</p>
<p>But most importantly, you are right&#8211;the fact that the person giving the critique has not read any of your books renders his or her arguments insignificant.  Like water on a duck&#8217;s back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
